Palestine
The humanitarian crisis in Palestine, with a focus on Gaza, the occupied territories, international humanitarian law, and the political economy of aid in the context of prolonged occupation and conflict.
Key Facts
- Over 5.9 million Palestinian refugees are registered with UNRWA across the Middle East
- Gaza has been under blockade since 2007, severely restricting movement of people and goods
- The International Court of Justice issued an advisory opinion in 2024 declaring the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories unlawful
- The conflict that escalated from October 2023 has caused unprecedented destruction in Gaza, with tens of thousands killed
- Over 1.9 million people in Gaza have been internally displaced since October 2023
Overview
Palestine represents one of the most protracted and politically charged humanitarian contexts in the world. The situation encompasses the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, where millions of Palestinians live under varying degrees of Israeli military control, settlement expansion, and, in Gaza’s case, a comprehensive blockade that has been in place since 2007.
The humanitarian dimensions of the Palestinian situation cannot be understood separately from the political context: a prolonged military occupation now in its sixth decade, the denial of Palestinian self-determination, and a framework in which humanitarian aid has often functioned as a substitute for political resolution rather than a complement to it. This dynamic has been the subject of extensive critical analysis, with scholars and practitioners arguing that the humanitarian system has, in effect, helped sustain the occupation by absorbing its costs.
The Crisis in Gaza
The escalation of hostilities from October 2023 has produced a humanitarian catastrophe of unprecedented scale in Gaza. The territory, home to approximately 2.3 million people, has experienced massive destruction of civilian infrastructure, including hospitals, schools, and residential areas. The near-total collapse of health, water, and sanitation systems has created conditions that the United Nations and international humanitarian organisations have described as among the worst in any contemporary conflict.
Access for humanitarian organisations has been severely constrained, with aid deliveries repeatedly obstructed. The civilian death toll has been staggering, with a significant proportion being women and children. The destruction has raised fundamental questions about the application of international humanitarian law and the capacity of the international system to protect civilian populations.
UNRWA and the Refugee Question
The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) has been the primary provider of education, health, and social services to Palestinian refugees since 1950. It serves over 5.9 million registered refugees across the occupied Palestinian territory, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria. UNRWA’s role is unique in the UN system: it is both a humanitarian agency and, by its very existence, a political marker of the unresolved refugee question.
The suspension of funding to UNRWA by multiple donor governments in early 2024 created an acute crisis for the agency’s operations at the very moment when its services were most desperately needed. The funding decisions, and the political dynamics surrounding them, illustrate how humanitarian assistance to Palestinians remains deeply entangled with geopolitical interests.
International Humanitarian Law
The application of international humanitarian law (IHL) to the situation in Palestine has been a central axis of debate. The ICJ’s 2024 advisory opinion, which declared the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories unlawful and called for its end, represented a significant legal development. Questions of proportionality, distinction between civilians and combatants, the prohibition on collective punishment, and the obligations of an occupying power are all live issues in the Palestinian context.
The Political Economy of Aid
Critical scholarship has long examined how humanitarian aid in Palestine functions within, and is constrained by, the political economy of occupation. Sara Roy’s concept of “de-development” describes the systematic undermining of Gaza’s economic capacity. Others have analysed how donor funding patterns, conditionality, and the institutional architecture of aid delivery have reinforced rather than challenged the structural conditions producing the crisis.
This analysis is particularly relevant to understanding how the humanitarian system responds to situations where the root causes of suffering are political and where the traditional humanitarian principles of neutrality and impartiality are tested by the realities of asymmetric power.